11:14 / 11/26/2009
November 25, 2009, at NKR NA plenary session, the Parliament member Gegham Baghdasaryan asked NKR Foreign Minister Georgi Petrosyan whether Euronews was true in reporting a significant breakthrough at the Sargsyan-Aliyev meeting in Munch, particularly that the Armenian side agreed to return all the seven regions, with maintaining control over the Lachin corridor, and preparatory work on a framework agreement was launched.
“We are specifying all the details. However, according to the information at our disposal, I can say that no essential progress was registered. Rather the sides took even harder lines. True, we are conducting negotiations on the basis pf Madrid Principles, but Armenia has introduced new elements in it. Any information on the preparation of a framework agreement is unavailable.”
Although OSCE MG Co-Chairs repeatedly state they inform the NKR leadership of the negotiation process details, Petrosyan said they are still specifying the details of the Munich meetings. It means the Karabakhi side is neglected in the negotiation process, whereas by 1998 all of the mediators’ proposals were sent to Armenia, Azerbaijan and Karabakh, and trilateral negotiations were conducted.
“We are specifying all the details. However, according to the information at our disposal, I can say that no essential progress was registered. Rather the sides took even harder lines. True, we are conducting negotiations on the basis pf Madrid Principles, but Armenia has introduced new elements in it. Any information on the preparation of a framework agreement is unavailable.”
Although OSCE MG Co-Chairs repeatedly state they inform the NKR leadership of the negotiation process details, Petrosyan said they are still specifying the details of the Munich meetings. It means the Karabakhi side is neglected in the negotiation process, whereas by 1998 all of the mediators’ proposals were sent to Armenia, Azerbaijan and Karabakh, and trilateral negotiations were conducted.
0 نظرهای شما:
Post a Comment